Reflections on the use of maps in the field of climate, peace, and security

This article critically examines the development and use of maps in climate security research and practice. Drawing on cartographic theory and practical experience in spatial analysis, we analyze how maps used in the field of climate security render territories legible, facilitate communication across diverse stakeholders, and enable user engagement. While acknowledging maps’ utility in visualizing complex climate-conflict relationships, we also identify significant limitations: subjective data decisions often hidden behind maps’ authoritative appearance, reproduction of power dynamics that privilege certain knowledge forms, and abstraction processes that may oversimplify socio-political realities. Rather than merely critiquing maps, we advocate for more reflexive mapping practices that acknowledge limitations, incorporate diverse knowledge systems, and promote transparency in data sources and methodological choices. This approach can help mapmakers and users engage more responsibly with mapping in the field of climate security.